Australia
PBAC and MSAC submissions, end-to-end.
Australian Health Technology Assessment covers two committees with two conventions. We build models for both (PBAC for medicines, MSAC for medical services and devices) and handle co-dependent submissions when the technology needs both.
PBAC vs MSAC: the two pathways.
PBAC evaluates medicines for the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Submissions cover clinical evaluation, economic evaluation, financial estimates, and a structured response to PBAC's clinical-need framework.
MSAC evaluates medical services, procedures, and devices for the Medicare Benefits Schedule and other government programs. Submissions cover clinical evaluation, comparative effectiveness, and a financial and utilisation analysis sized to the proposed MBS item.
Co-dependent submissions link a device or diagnostic at MSAC with a pharmaceutical at PBAC (companion diagnostics are the textbook case). The evidence base for both submissions has to be coherent across the two committees.
Where HEC fits in the pathway.
Strategy + pre-submission
Comparator selection, CUA vs CMA decision, identification of co-dependency, threshold framing for the relevant clinical area.
Model build on HEX Platform™
Cost-utility, partitioned-survival, or Markov. 5% discount, AUD currency, AU-specific resource use. Every parameter audited; probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA), and scenario tables pre-baked.
Section 1 to 4 dossier
Section 1 (clinical case), Section 2 (clinical evaluation), Section 3 (economic evaluation), Section 4 (utilisation and financial estimates). Written to the PBAC / MSAC plain-English idiom.
Response cycle
PBAC and MSAC pre-meeting requests and post-meeting reconsideration responses turned around within the agency's published windows.
Section 100 / specialist listings
HSD, EFC, IVF, and other restricted listings have different budget contexts. We adjust the financial estimates accordingly.
Co-dependent coordination
Companion diagnostic + therapeutic submissions kept evidence-coherent across the two committees and timed to land together.
Common questions on PBAC and MSAC.
What's the difference between PBAC and MSAC?
PBAC evaluates medicines for the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. MSAC evaluates new medical services, procedures, and devices for the Medicare Benefits Schedule and government programs. The evaluation conventions are similar in spirit but distinct in execution.
What discount rate applies?
5% per year on costs and outcomes in the base case for both committees. Sensitivity at 0% and 3.5% is conventional. Re-cutting from NICE / Pharmac 3.5% bases matters, because the answer changes.
Section 100 vs general schedule?
Section 100 specialist listings (HSD, EFC, IVF) have distinct evaluation and budget contexts. We adjust uptake, displacement, and resource-use assumptions to match.
Co-dependent submissions?
For companion diagnostics and similar device+therapy bundles, we structure the evidence packs to land at PBAC and MSAC in coordination.
Planning a PBAC or MSAC submission?
30 minutes to scope the work, including whether you need PBAC, MSAC, or both, and decide if an agreement fits.
Book a 30-minute call